Monday, December 19, 2011

The Secret To Successful Dividend Investing In Today's Markets ...

Buy the business, not the market: That?s been my message since the first issue of Utility Forecaster in March 1989. It?s meant staying invested despite gut-wrenching volatility, such as the historic crash/recession/credit crunch of 2008-09.

And I?ve misjudged prospects of individual companies as well, such as American Superconductor (AMSC) earlier this year. At such times there?s nothing to do but take the loss and move onto something more promising. But following the strategy has consistently built wealth, cycle after cycle. Admittedly, sticking to a buy and hold strategy is as difficult now as it?s ever been.

A nearly unanimous consensus has emerged among economists, investors, politicians and media personalities that the world is headed for a recession at best, and very likely a market catastrophe even worse than 2008-09.

Many investors have decided they can?t afford to risk that by staying in the market. Such extreme sentiment is typical in times of exceptional volatility.

Unfortunately, unlike in years past, investors have literally no alternatives to dividend-paying stocks. Traditional savings investments pay a percentage point or less. Bonds are worse, with only the exceptionally risky dishing out anything close to a decent yield.

If you live off your investments, you literally can?t afford not to own stocks. The commitment has to be for more than a season, in order to capture needed income and avoid punitive taxation.

Know the Risks

Fortunately, following a few simple rules will limit your portfolio?s volatility and, most important, dividend risk. The first is to know your companies.

A high current yield can be a jumping off point for further study. But it should never be the only reason you buy a particular stock. Rather, look for companies that clearly can maintain and preferably grow dividends over time.

Some readers justify holding a riskier, high-yielding stock on the grounds they?ll still get a big return even if dividends are cut. Reality is weakness often begets more weakness in a slow-growth environment like this one. Unless a company is clearly turning the corner, odds are the first cut is a warning of worse to come. And dividend cuts always trigger selling. A 10 percent yield cut in half is still 5 percent. But if the stock falls just 5 percent in response, total return is zero.

In contrast, stock prices always follow a rising payout over time. Dominion Resources (D), for example, has raised its dividend by 52.7 percent over the last decade. That?s basically in line with the 70 percent increase in its share price, despite some jagged ups and downs along the way.

Even the strongest company can stumble. The real damage in any bear market comes from the handful of companies that truly implode as businesses.

Keeping up with the quarterly numbers, financing needs and regulatory developments is step one to avoiding a lot of pain. Step two is portfolio balance.

If a stock that?s 5 percent of your portfolio falls in half, you lose just 2.5 percent. But if you have half your portfolio in the same stock, you lose a quarter of your wealth.

Worse, overloading can create an emotional bond between investor and stock, making it impossible to exit if things don?t go your way. Some will commit the cardinal sin of averaging down, raising portfolio risk even more.

The antidote is to never average down and to pare back winners every three months, re-deploying funds to entirely new positions.

One unemotional way to buy good stocks very cheap is to enter ?buy limit? orders at prices well below current levels. You?ll only buy if the price set is reached. That may take a while, and you?ll need cash on hand. But if your price is hit, you?re guaranteed a screaming bargain. Just ask those with buy limit orders for 30 or lower on Mar. 15 for Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD). They?re now up 50 percent-plus, thanks to an intra-day drop to $27.85. Check out my Seeking Alpha article, "What I Look For When Selecting MLPs," for more on EPD and MLP investing.

Aug. 8 and Oct. 4 were also great days to get buy limit orders executed. And as long as macro risks dominate the headlines, we?re bound to see more like them. Of course, a big drop in a stock can be due to real business weakness. If that?s the case, those with executed buy limit orders will have to be ready to exit. But you can limit risk by not putting orders on stocks you already own.

If you?re keeping up with the health of your targets, you can pull your buy limit order long before trouble hits. I also strongly advise investors not to use stop-losses to protect positions. It?s likely Enterprise Products fell so far on Mar. 15 because a mountain of stops was hit. Those investors took huge losses and were hit with commissions and probably taxes, even as buy limit orders scored big.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Source: http://seekingalpha.com/article/314349-the-secret-to-successful-dividend-investing-in-today-s-markets

earthquake today earthquake today droid razr oklahoma news atomic clock earthquake map geoffrey mutai

Friday, December 16, 2011

Coach sends an ally packing on 'Survivor'

Divine intervention and/or incredible self-delusion and/or good strategy sent Brandon Hantz to Redemption Island on Survivor South Pacific, as Ben ?Coach? Wade turned on his ally after Brandon shockingly gave up immunity during Tribal Council. That sends us into Sunday?s finale with Brandon facing off against Ozzy Lusth during the final Redemption Island duel, and Coach, Sophie Clarke, Albert Destrade, and Rick ?Who?? Nelson as our final five.

Before we get into the crazy events of the episode, a disclaimer: I let God write this recap, so no don?t even think of blaming me for anything you don?t like about it. Actually, Coach?s strategy of telling Brandon that he was voting him out because God told him to was pretty genius?except I?d bet Coach believes that 100 percent. It?s odd, isn?t it, how if you hear voices, you?re crazy, unless you say that voice is a higher power?

First, at the duel, Edna didn?t almost beat Ozzy; the preview tried to get us to believe she?d defeat him, but of course, since the preview suggested that, we knew it was likely a fake-out. Edna lost even though, as Jeff Probst pointed out during the duel, there was ?an entire tribe working on this duel? because they ?so desperately don?t want Ozzy back in.?

Back at camp, Sophie nicknamed Redemption Island ?Ozzy?s Pleasure Dome,? and pointed out that he?s been poisoning the jury, comforting and feeding each person before sending them to the jury after winning a duel. Although Albert approached Coach about voting out Sophie, because Albert always thinks his dumb plans are the best move possible, Coach and Sophie wanted to send Brandon to Ozzy?s Pleasure Dome, and the editors kept including Brandon foreshadowing his exit: ?This is fate. We?re in God?s hands,? ?God?s got everything under control.?

Brandon twice walked in on conversations about the tribe?s plan to vote him out?twice! The second was the most incredible, as Coach was doing a on-the-fly interview (when a producer pulls a contestant/cast member aside and asks a question about something that just happened in the moment, instead of later during an interview), and Brandon just walked up behind him.

Coach was talking about being annoyed at Brandon, mostly because Brandon figured out that Coach was talking about voting him out because Brandon had become too sane and likable post-merge. ?Come on, man. Don?t sound like Russell,? Coach told Brandon, adding ?you say that?s not what we?re thinking about? even though Brandon knew exactly what they were talking about. But thankfully, they hugged it out (Brandon pleaded: ?Please give me a hug man?), and Coach told us in the start of his on-the-fly: ?The apple never falls far from the tree.?

But the apple won immunity, though he credited God, who we can thank for making the episode even more interesting, because his win threw the tribe into chaos. Rick, worst cast member ever, full of pizza that Brandon won as reward and shared with him (Brandon called Rick ?Cowboy??he has a nickname?!) exploded on Albert, telling everyone that Albert wanted to send Sophie home. Earlier, Rick and Albert talked about this, and about going to the final two together, and Rick said, ?I haven?t changed anything.? No shit, you haven?t even been on the island for most of the season.

Coach said, ?I believe in divine intervention,? and suggested God wanted to save Brandon, hence his immunity challenge win. But then Brandon told Coach, ?You know by now that God speaks to me,? and said they had to forgive Albert and stick with him, and thus vote off Sophie, and Brandon was so convinced that he had to forgive Albert that he decided to give his individual immunity to Albert.

And that?s exactly what he did, right at the start of Tribal Council. Albert, being sane and rational, did not give it back, saying he?d give it back if he knew Brandon was in trouble. Albert did cast the only other vote for Sophie, perhaps as a way of trying to win Brandon?s favor as a jury member.

Coach knew he was the swing vote, so he did what any logical, sane person would do: waited for the voices in his head to tell him what to do. ?I will do whatever God tells me to do,? he said. ?I begged God to speak to me like he?s never spoken to me before.? One name came down from upon high repeatedly, and that left Coach ?at complete peace,? he said before casting his swing vote to send Brandon home.

?It?s God?s will. Go win Redemption,? Coach whispered to Brandon as he hugged Coach. And with that, Mark Burnett got two seasons of Redemption Island actually being about religious redemption, alienating a bunch of Survivor fans in the process but giving Jesus a nice pre-birthday present that I?m sure Jesus will pay back by helping Burnett sell his Todd Palin reality show.

Source: http://www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/archives/survivor_south_pacific/2011_Dec_15_brandon-hantz-out

mlk mlk the big year the big year breast cancer walk breast cancer walk detroit tigers

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

With next season, Bellator makes move to Friday nights

With next season, Bellator makes move to Friday nightsBellator Fighting Championships, the tournament-based promotion, is moving their broadcast from Saturdays to Fridays for their next season, which is expected to start in March. Instead of competing with UFC pay-per-view and Fox events, which normally air on Saturdays, Bellator will now go up against "The Ultimate Fighter," and promotions such as MFC and XFC, which usually air on HDNet, and possibly Showtime airings of Strikeforce: Challengers and M-1 Global bouts.

USA Today spoke to Bellator CEO Bjorn Rebney about the change:

"We didn't really dig into the analysis and try to assess who was one, who was two and who was three, or what we were trying to avoid the most," he said. "It just kind of came down to an analysis of, is there a night where all the factors made it to where we can maximize live-event attendance, where we can reach the largest audience from an television perspective, to give MMA fans an opportunity to really make a night for themselves with Bellator."

Bellator will move to Spike, the UFC's cable TV home until Saturday, in 2013, but the 2012 season will continue to air on MTV2. The upcoming season will feature fights between welterweight champ Ben Askren and Douglas Lima, Hector Lombard and Alexander Shlemenko's rematch, plus welterweight and bantamweight titles.

The promotion has consistently put on exciting fights, but they were lost upon an MMA audience that would focus on the UFC. Michael Chandler's upset of Eddie Alvarez was one of the year's best fights, but went against UFC 139, and aired not long before Dan Henderson and Mauricio Rua's epic bout.

Friday means that Bellator will no longer battle with these events, but it's not a perfect day. Bellator will still face plenty of competition on Fridays, both from other MMA offerings and from other sports.

Will a Friday night air date make Bellator easier for you to watch? Vote in the poll and tell us in the comments or on Facebook.

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/blog/cagewriter/post/With-next-season-Bellator-makes-move-to-Friday-?urn=mma-wp10275

daniel day lewis patti stanger pasadena pasadena famu famu martina mcbride

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Stocks rise as European leaders hash out plans (AP)

Stocks are rising at the open on hopes for a plan to restore long-term confidence in the euro.

French and German leaders are meeting to discuss closer political and economic cooperation between the 17 nations that use the currency. They want tighter control of budgets, to prevent the kinds of debts that might to cause Greece and others to default.

Stocks overseas rose modestly Monday, while the yields on Italian bonds dove, suggesting traders believe that Italy is less likely to default. Italy's government agreed this weekend on a package of austerity and economic growth measures.

The Dow is up 135 points, or 1.1 percent at 12,154. The S&P 500 is up 16, or 1.3 percent at 1,261. The Nasdaq composite index is up 32, or 1.2 percent at 2,659.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/europe/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111205/ap_on_bi_st_ma_re/us_wall_street

greg halman greg halman love and hip hop dancing with the stars results there will be blood there will be blood how to cook a turkey

Return of the Persian leopard In Afghanistan's central highlands

Monday, December 5, 2011

Recent camera trap images from the rocky terrain of Afghanistan's central highlands have revealed a surprise: a Persian leopard, an apex predator long thought to have disappeared from the region, according to the Wildlife Conservation Society.

In a series of images that provides indisputable proof that the big cat persists in the country's interior, a big adult leopard can be seen prowling around the camera trap's field of view and investigating the camera itself, appearing to threaten it with canines exposed.

The camera traps captured dozens of images of other wildlife species, including lynx, wild cat, wolf, red fox, and stone marten, an impressive suite of predators still surviving in the Hindu Kush highlands, where Wildlife Conservation Society scientists and Afghan rangers have been conducting surveys in recent months.

"To see such a varied array of wildlife after we have endured so much conflict gives us hope for Afghanistan's future," said Mostapha Zaher, Director General of Afghanistan's National Environmental Protection Agency. "Intact ecosystems represent a foundation for our country's reconstruction and development. This is also our heritage, our natural resources, our fauna and flora. It is incumbent upon all of us to conserve and protect our environment and hand it over to the next generation of the citizens of Afghanistan."

Camera traps give conservationists a valuable research tool in remote wildlife areas. In addition to providing a cross-section of an ecosystem in terms of the presence and absence of wildlife, the devices record data that, in sufficient quantities and placement, can be used to generate population estimates for individual species.

"The presence of leopards and lynxes in Afghanistan tells us that these big cats are finding enough prey to survive," said Ghani Ghuriani, Deputy Minister of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock. "This means that the rangelands can still support ibex, urial, and other species, which is a good sign for both wildlife and the people of this region who also depend on these grasslands for grazing."

Peter Zahler, Deputy Director of WCS's Asia Program, said: "We are thrilled by these images and the story of survival that they tell, but we were sobered by the fact that the cameras also took photographs of local people walking past with guns. Poaching is still a very real threat, and WCS is committed to helping the Afghan government and local communities protect these rare and beautiful animals."

With the assistance of WCS and in partnership with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the government of Afghanistan has launched several initiatives to safeguard the country's wild places and the wildlife they contain. This includes the creation of the country's first and only national park, Band-e-Amir, in 2009, which is co-managed by local villagers and the government. The park provides jobs and revenue from the thousands of tourists who visit each week during the summer months. WCS worked with Afghanistan's National Environment Protection Agency to create the country's first-ever list of protected species, which prohibits the hunting of snow leopards, brown bears, and other wildlife. WCS provides educational workshops for soldiers at Bagram Air Base and other military bases across Afghanistan in an effort to limit illegal wildlife trade in the country that threatens leopards and other fur-bearing animals.

With USAID support, WCS has worked with the Afghan government, UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), and others to craft new environmental laws and regulations and train government officials in their application. WCS works directly with more than 55 local communities in Afghanistan to better manage their natural resources. WCS staff train and deploy community rangers to monitor wildlife, and patrol the region to stop poaching and enforce the new environmental laws.

###

Wildlife Conservation Society: http://www.wcs.org

Thanks to Wildlife Conservation Society for this article.

This press release was posted to serve as a topic for discussion. Please comment below. We try our best to only post press releases that are associated with peer reviewed scientific literature. Critical discussions of the research are appreciated. If you need help finding a link to the original article, please contact us on twitter or via e-mail.

This press release has been viewed 12 time(s).

Source: http://www.labspaces.net/115728/Return_of_the_Persian_leopard_In_Afghanistan_s_central_highlands

jim boeheim jim boeheim bill of rights toys r us toys r us shame shame

Monday, December 5, 2011

Italy's Monti seeks broad support for crisis measures (Reuters)

ROME (Reuters) ? Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti met party leaders on Saturday to drum up support for new measures aimed at shoring up public finances, helping growth and calming the debt crisis in the euro zone's third largest economy.

Italy's cabinet is set to approve the package of reforms on Monday, a step seen as vital for re-establishing Italy's shattered credibility with financial markets after a series of unfulfilled promises by the previous government.

The plan will then be outlined during two news conferences - one with foreign reporters - and presented in both houses of parliament in the afternoon.

Government sources familiar with the plan say the mix of cuts and tax rises will total about 20-25 billion euros over the next two years, about half of which will be used to reduce the budget deficit and help balance the budget by 2013 despite the economic downturn and rising borrowing costs.

The rest will free up resources to try to regenerate Italy's recession-bound economy.

Pier Ferdinando Casini, head of the centrist UDC party, said after meeting Monti that the measures would be severe, but hopefully also fair.

"When the doctor arrives, it's difficult to prescribe nice medicine. Medicine is always bitter, but sometimes inevitable to prevent the patient dying," he told a news conference.

Angelino Alfano, secretary of former premier Silvio Berlusconi's PDL party, said he had urged Monti to ensure the cuts did not fall heavily on those who have always shouldered the burden, and to show special consideration for families.

The plan is expected to include an increase in the retirement age for many workers, liberalizing professional services, raising income tax on higher income brackets and new taxes on private assets and luxury goods.

FAIRNESS

Monti will meet unions and local authorities on Sunday to try to reach a broad consensus on the plan. He has said fairness is one of the key priorities of his reforms, but unions are grumbling about possible pension and labor market changes.

Susanna Camusso, secretary of Italy's biggest union CGIL, said she was struggling to see signs of equity in the plan, based on what she knew so far from reports, but would wait until after speaking with Monti on Sunday to make her judgment.

"We are ready to support the right decisions but also determined to oppose those we consider wrong," she said at a union assembly on Saturday.

Italy has been at the centre of Europe's debt crisis since yields on its 10-year bonds shot up to around 7 percent and above, similar to levels seen when countries like Greece and Ireland were forced to seek a bailout.

Monti will have to balance the competing needs of showing budget rigor while not choking off growth, without which it will be impossible to reduce a debt mountain equivalent to 120 percent of gross domestic product.

Changes to pensions will be key in the new reform plan, with eligibility requirements toughened up for so-called seniority pensions which are based on a combination of workers' age and the years for which they have paid contributions.

Programmed cuts to the national health service budget are expected to be accelerated by one year, to reduce spending by 2.5 billion euros in 2012 and 5 bln euros from 2013, a local government source said.

A local housing tax (ICI) may also be reintroduced, bringing in estimated revenue of at least 3.5 billion euros per year.

Other expected measures include further increases in value added tax rates and a ban on cash transactions above 500 euros in an effort to tackle tax evasion.

(Editing by David Cowell)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/economy/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111203/bs_nm/us_italy

oregon stanford jon huntsman darrell hammond darrell hammond tcu boise state boxer rebellion

Engadget Mobile Podcast 115 - 12.03.2011

XXL times call for XXL podcasts. That's why we're here with you this week for more than two hours, with help straight from the center of the netbook universe, Taipei, in the form of netbooknews.com's Nicole Scott. What could possibly go wrong?

Hosts: Myriam Joire (tnkgrl), Brad Molen, Joseph Volpe
Guest: Nicole Scott
Producer: Trent Wolbe
Music: Tycho - Coastal Brake (Ghostly International)

00:01:55 - Which companies are on the Carrier IQ bandwagon?
00:31:28 - Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich review
00:40:00 - Galaxy Nexus HSPA+ review
00:52:57 - ASUS Eee Pad Transformer Prime review
01:34:48 - LG Nitro HD hands-on (update: video)
01:42:09 - FCC accepts AT&T's request for withdrawal, plans to release report on its findings today (update: it's out!)
01:43:20 - AT&T blows a gasket, calls FCC report 'an advocacy piece, not analysis'
01:50:00 - Sharp's slim 12.1 megapixel CMOS sensor to further trim smartphone silhouettes (updated)
01:50:20 - Microsoft enables Android and iOS users to experience Windows Phone 7... via the web



Hear the podcast


Subscribe to the podcast
[iTunes] Subscribe to the Podcast directly in iTunes
[RSS MP3] Add the Engadget Mobile Podcast feed (in MP3) to your RSS aggregator and have the show delivered automatically
[RSS AAC] Add the Engadget Mobile Podcast feed (in enhanced AAC) to your RSS aggregator
[Zune] Subscribe to the Podcast directly in the Zune Marketplace

Download the podcast
LISTEN (MP3)
LISTEN (AAC)

Contact the podcast

podcast (at) engadgetmobile (dot) com.

Follow us on Twitter
@tnkgrl @phonewisdom @engadgetmobile @jrvolpe @nicole_Scooter

Engadget Mobile Podcast 115 - 12.03.2011 originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/03/engadget-mobile-podcast-115-12-03-2011/

tim gunn tim gunn death clock death clock cerebral palsy powerball lenny dykstra

Friday, December 2, 2011

Senate approves $662 billion defense bill

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., center, accompanied by, from left, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin of Ill., and Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters about extending the payroll tax cut, Thursday, Dec. 1, 2011, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., center, accompanied by, from left, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin of Ill., and Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters about extending the payroll tax cut, Thursday, Dec. 1, 2011, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev. speaks to reporters about extending the payroll tax cut, Thursday, Dec. 1, 2011, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., center, accompanied by Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin of Ill., and Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters about extending the payroll tax cut, Thursday, Dec. 1, 2011, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

(AP) ? Ignoring a presidential veto threat, the Democratic-controlled Senate on Thursday overwhelmingly approved a massive, $662 billion defense bill that would require the military to hold suspected terrorists linked to al-Qaida or its affiliates, even those captured on U.S. soil, and detain some indefinitely.

The vote was 93-7 for the bill authorizing money for military personnel, weapons systems, national security programs in the Energy Department, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in the fiscal year that began Oct. 1. Reflecting a period of austerity and a winding down of decade-old conflicts, the bill is $27 billion less than what President Barack Obama requested and $43 billion less than what Congress gave the Pentagon this year.

Shortly before final passage, the Senate unanimously backed crippling sanctions on Iran as fears about Tehran developing a nuclear weapon outweighed concerns about driving up oil prices that would hit economically strapped Americans at the gas pump. The vote was 100-0.

"Iran's actions are unacceptable and pose a danger to the United States and the entire world," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said. "Iran supports terrorist groups, arms the killers of American soldiers, lies about its nuclear program, violates its citizens' basic rights and threatens Israel's security."

The Senate's version of the defense bill still must be reconciled with the House-passed measure in the final weeks of the congressional session.

In an escalating fight with the White House, the bill would ramp up the role of the military in handling terror suspects. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and FBI Director Robert Mueller both oppose the provisions as does the White House, which said it cannot accept any legislation that "challenges or constrains the president's authorities to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists and protect the nation."

Late Thursday, a White House official said the veto threat still stands.

The bill would require military custody of a suspect deemed to be a member of al-Qaida or its affiliates and involved in plotting or committing attacks on the United States. American citizens would be exempt. The bill does allow the executive branch to waive the authority based on national security and hold a suspect in civilian custody.

The legislation also would deny suspected terrorists, even U.S. citizens seized within the nation's borders, the right to trial and subject them to indefinite detention. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., had sought an exception to the provision for U.S. citizens, but her effort failed, 55-45.

Lengthy negotiations produced a face-saving move that the Senate backed 99-1, a measure that said nothing in the bill changes current law relating to the detention of U.S. citizens and legal aliens. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., repeatedly pointed out that the June 2004 Supreme Court decision in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld said U.S. citizens can be detained indefinitely.

The series of detention provisions challenges citizens' rights under the Constitution, tests the boundaries of executive and legislative branch authority and sets up a showdown with the Democratic commander in chief. Civil rights groups fiercely oppose the bill.

"Since the bill puts military detention authority on steroids and makes it permanent, American citizens and others are at greater risk of being locked away by the military without charge or trial if this bill becomes law," said Christopher Anders, senior legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.

The bill reflects the politically charged dispute over whether to treat suspected terrorists as prisoners of war or criminals. The administration insists that the military, law enforcement and intelligence agents need flexibility in prosecuting the war on terror after they've succeeded in killing Osama bin Laden and Anwar al-Awlaki. Republicans counter that their efforts are necessary to respond to an evolving, post-Sept. 11 threat, and that Obama has failed to produce a consistent policy on handling terror suspects.

The Senate rejected an effort by Feinstein to limit a military custody requirement for suspects to those captured outside the United States. The vote was 55-45. Feinstein said her goal was to ensure "the military won't be roaming our streets looking for suspected terrorists."

The issue divided Democrats, with nine senators, many facing re-election next year, breaking with their leadership and administration to vote against the amendment. Republicans held firm, with only Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Mark Kirk of Illinois and Mike Lee of Utah backing Feinstein's effort.

"We need the authority to hold those individuals in military custody so we aren't reading them Miranda rights," Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., said in defense of the legislation.

Last week, the administration announced a new set of penalties against Iran, including identifying for the first time Iran's entire banking sector as a "primary money laundering concern." This requires increased monitoring by U.S. banks to ensure that they and their foreign affiliates avoid dealing with Iranian financial institutions.

But lawmakers pressed ahead with even tougher penalties despite reservations by the administration.

Sens. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., and Kirk had widespread bipartisan support for their amendment that would target foreign financial institutions that do business with the Central Bank of Iran, barring them from opening or maintaining correspondent operations in the United States. It would apply to foreign central banks only for transactions that involve the sale or purchase of petroleum or petroleum products.

The sanctions on petroleum would only apply if the president determines there is a sufficient alternative supply and if the country with jurisdiction over the financial institution has not significantly reduced its purchases of Iranian oil.

Testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, David Cohen, a senior Treasury Department official, and Wendy Sherman, an undersecretary of state, warned that the amendment could force up oil prices ? a financial boon for Iran.

"There is absolutely a risk that in fact the price of oil would go up, which would mean that Iran would in fact have more money to fuel its nuclear ambitions, not less," Sherman said. "And our real objective here is to cut off the economic means that Iran has for its nuclear program."

Cohen said the amendment would tell foreign banks and companies "that if they continue to process oil transactions with the Central Bank of Iran their access to the United States can be terminated."

"It is a very, very powerful threat," Cohen warned. "It is a threat for the commercial banks to end their ability to transact in the dollar and their ability really to function as major international financial institutions," and one that could push allies away from contributing to a coordinated effort against Iran.

___

Associated Press writer Bradley Klapper contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2011-12-01-US-Congress-Defense/id-22509b088d9940d8a04201f5d11a4a9b

percy harvin percy harvin best cyber monday deals best cyber monday deals cyber monday grover norquist grover norquist